Showing posts with label Governor Brown. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Governor Brown. Show all posts

Friday, October 26, 2012

What Really Matters?


First and foremost: GO GIANTS



The state of California is in a terrible state. According to the last count only three people in the whole state completely understand the new budget, one is the Governor and he is having a difficult time explaining it to his constituents, the other two live alone and nobody knows who they are. For the past thirty years school initiatives passed as well as those for fast trains, highway expansions and save the universe bonds. Californians have grown weary of the state’s perpetual begging and badgering and no longer believe the politicians, teachers unions, environmentalists, and the news. This may be an electorate who says no to everything this year. “Governor, go pound sand.”

More than once I have pointed to the incredible number of associations, departments, commissions, and agencies that seem to proliferate at the state level. No department is immune. Many are at cross purposes, all cost money. And the streets still fall apart, kids can’t read, and more and more people are out of work.

This is not the blog to find answers; if I knew the answers I would bottle it and sell it on street corners (with a license of course, I’ve applied but still waiting). Besides no one listens anymore – it’s all shouting and finger-pointing, then when they lose, they go away and sulk. But they will return, bet on it.

Let’s just look at one example, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA for short). Forty years ago its goal was simple; analyze a proposed project so that all the major issues are set before a city council or county supervisors for a more educated approval or denial. If has morphed into a huge industry that fundamentally says to most developers “No way, no how.” Due to the volume of paperwork generated for even the smallest project, no one reads the reports, no one understands them, and what is more important, nothing gets done due to the potential for lawsuits. Even now litigation is built into the planning process. Not on the document itself but on “how” the document was produced, and its scope, and its facts. CEQA on CEQA.

Huge developments and projects (from residential to industrial) take years to evolve and get built, many go through economic shifts (like the last four years), they never turn out as they are planned. These projects become instantly out of sync with the approved Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Thus, is there any value in the document itself? What is its purpose then? Is it worth the costs? I can assure you that every nickel spent on an EIR is passed on to the consumer through higher and higher pricing.

It’s all about consultants and experts, in fact a whole industry - with little or no culpability - has grown serving these interests. To my point, just have the governor announce that CEQA should be thrown out and a newer and more streamlined process will instituted that quickly looks at a project and then allows it to move forward. Stand back, the screams from state agencies (water quality, traffic, etc.), Sierra Club and other environmental groups, as well as NIMBYs, NONONOs, and other special interests will cause deafness. The system is broken and BandAids won’t do the job.

The legal world just loves CEQA and EIRs. This process and these documents become so convoluted that only $500 an hour attorneys understand them, just get six in a room and listen to their opinions – none will agree. It is supposed to be a factual document, based on real science and real calculations, phooey. Much is opinion and speculation based on extrapolations the greatest computers couldn’t calculate. And if it is a “pet” project, they try circumvent the process, such as the High Speed Rail’s attempt to avoid CEQA and “speed” things up. Welcome to our side of the street.

It is now a process that is fundamentally structured to hobble or squash concepts and projects. Whether a new town, affordable housing, gas extraction, high speed rail, highways, and even solar projects – go figure. The defenders say that the courts have continually been fair and just when reviewing these claims. Now that is the problem in and of itself - if the process were fair and just, these documents should not have to be decided in court. Years of lost time and money are wasted in the courts.



A new process must be developed to assess projects. Do I believe that this can happen? No. Do I think that the various special interests will give up their assumed importance? No. Do I believe that the state will find a way to make allow things to happen again? No. Do I believe we are a long way from building and growing ourselves out of our problems? Yes.

Why do you think in this state “shovel ready projects” didn’t happen? The EIR wasn’t and it still isn’t finished.

Stay Tuned . . . . .

Friday, August 3, 2012

State Bureaucracy and Our Money


Assume the Mattress is a State Agency

With all the embarrassing comments in the press these last few days about the State of California finding millions of dollars in the secret and some not too secret accounts, it begins to make you wonder. Almost two years ago I ran across a list of all the state agencies at the time. (The following is a reprint of a portion of that blog.)

From October 22, 2010
Currently the State of California has over 520 caucuses, commissions, associations, departments, divisions, boards, bureaus, agencies, networks, councils, courts, and authorities as well as universities, and the senate and assembly. Within each of these there are innumerable programs and sub-committees. Without expanding or stretching the imagination at least 75 of these agencies have a direct involvement with housing and development within the state. Some have almost veto-like control through the morass of approvals. For your entertainment listed below are these agencies, be advised: each has a director, staff, programs, and attendant consultants in the private side (you can skip it unless you need to take a nap).

California Air Resources Board (CARB) ** California Architects Board ** California Arts Council ** California Attorney General ** California Bay Conservation and Development Commission ** California Bay-Delta Authority ** California Bay-Delta Office ** California Biodiversity Council ** California Board for Geologists and Geophysicists ** California Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors ** California Building Standards Commission ** California Bureau of Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation** California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency ** California Coastal Commission ** California Coastal Conservancy ** California Cultural Resources Division** California Delta Protection Commission ** California Department of Community Services and Development ** California Department of Conservation ** California Department of Fair Employment and Housing ** California Department of Housing and Community Development ** California Department of Public Health ** California Department of Real Estate ** California Department of Toxic Substances Control ** California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) ** California Department of Water Resources ** California Division of Codes and Standards ** California Division of Engineering ** California Division of Housing Policy Development ** California Division of Land and Right of Way ** California Division of Land Resource Protection ** California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) ** California Division of Planning and Local Assistance ** California Division of the State Architect ** California Electricity Oversight Board ** California Energy Commission ** California Environment and Natural Resources Agency ** California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) ** California Environmental Resources Evaluation System (CERES) ** California Fish and Game Commission ** California Floodplain Management ** California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research ** California Grant and Enterprise Zone Programs HCD Loan ** California High-Speed Rail Authority ** California History and Culture Agency ** California Housing Finance Agency ** California Indoor Air Quality Program ** California Industrial Development Financing Advisory Commission ** California Integrated Waste Management Board ** California Land Use Planning Information Network (LUPIN) ** California Lands Commission ** California Landscape Architects Technical Committee ** California Office of Historic Preservation ** California Park and Recreation Commission ** California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) ** California Real Estate Services Division ** California Regional Water Quality Control Boards ** California Registered Veterinary Technician Committee ** California San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission ** California San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy ** California San Joaquin River Conservancy ** California Seismic Safety Commission ** California State Assembly ** California State Lands Commission ** California State Park and Recreation Commission ** California Tahoe Conservancy ** California Transportation Commission ** California Water Resources Control Board ** California Wetlands Information System ** California Wildlife and Habitat Data Analysis Branch ** California Wildlife Conservation Board ** California Wildlife Programs Branch
Without a doubt some of these are necessary for the future of the state and well managed growth. Some continue to meddle and offer ordinances, controls and “guidelines” that contribute nothing to the efficient course of development in the state. The market does as good a job of determining the quality of a project more than a staffer in some small cubicle in Sacramento. 

Now I ask you, is all this necessary Mr. Brown? How many have rainy day funds, office supply funds, just in case funds, and forgotten mattress funds that have hidden away our taxes? How can you be serious about a tax increase when many of these agencies continue to be funded and survive?

And with the looming specter of High-Speed Rail and its numerous subcommittees and associated commissions, are we in for even more shell games in the future?

Stay Tuned . . . . .